If you’re managing your call for papers through email and spreadsheets right now, you’re in good company. That’s where most teams start. It feels quick and familiar—until conference season hits. Suddenly, everyone’s drowning in scattered files and endless email threads. It takes three back-and-forth messages just to answer a simple question like, “What’s the status on this submission?”
When managing conference abstract reviews becomes part of the conversation, this resource can add context around submission collection, peer review, and scheduling.
Sound familiar? It doesn’t have to be this way.
An abstract management system isn’t about adding complexity. It centralizes everything. This means you can manage submissions, reviews, and conversations in one spot. The software just gives everyone a shared space where they can actually find things. Learn more about the software by viewing this abstract and application management overview , providing you understanding on submission collection, peer review, and scheduling stay organized.
Need to learn more about abstract management system, watch these CATALYST features videos, to learn more about how to make submission collection, peer review, and scheduling stay consistent.
Recommended Reading
New to this whole process?
Making the Switch Without Making Everyone Miserable
Here’s the thing: your team doesn’t need a sales pitch. They need to know this won’t make their lives harder. Keep your message simple and honest. A good system should cut down on email, make the review process feel fairer, and give you data you can actually use.
The fastest way to get buy-in? Target their biggest pain points and show small, tangible wins in week one.
Turning Pain Points Into Quick Wins
Let’s walk through the common objections and how to address them:
“I’m already drowning in email.”
Right now, important files and deadlines are scattered across dozens of threads. With a portal, you put instructions, deadlines, and files in one place. The win? When someone asks, “What’s left to review?” the answer is right there in the dashboard instead of buried in your inbox.
“How do we make sure this is fair?”
People worry about conflicts of interest and vague scoring rubrics. A good system will flag possible conflicts before you assign reviews. The system will also keep the scoring criteria next to the abstracts. Reviewers can start scoring faster and with more confidence.
“This is going to slow us down.”
This concern comes up a lot, and it’s understandable—new tools can feel clunky. But in reality, reviewers find a clear dashboard showing exactly what needs attention. They open the submission, score it with the criteria right there on screen, and move on. Most people find things faster than the old email and spreadsheet process.
“Not another new tool to learn”
Team fatigue is real. The fix: give people a short, recorded demo and a one-page quick start guide so they can see what they’re getting into. Most people feel confident enough to dive in the same day.
The CATALYST Advantage
If you go with Omnipress, you get a CATALYST Project Manager who sets up your site based on your specific policies and timeline. They’ll walk you through a demo and stick around for questions. The whole point is to flatten that learning curve so your team can focus on the actual work, not figuring out the tool.
What Your Stakeholders Actually Care About
Stop talking about features. Talk outcomes. Here is what your stakeholders get out of the switch:
| Your Goal | What People Actually Get |
|---|---|
| One place for everything | No more hunting through email—submissions, reviews, messages, and reports all in one portal. |
| Fair, consistent outcomes | Clear scoring criteria right where the work happens, plus early conflict flagging. |
| Less email | Updates and reminders live in the portal, not your inbox. |
| Clear status at a glance | Full visibility into the process. Dashboards and reports give you instant, reliable status updates and actionable data for confident decision-making. |
| Better program quality | Smart forms that only show relevant fields and catch incomplete submissions. |
| Institutional memory | A clean archive you can reference when planning next year. |
Tips and Tricks
For a step-by-step look at timelines, forms, and review structures, see How to Set Up Your Abstract Management System for Better Speaker Submissions
Simple Scripts for Your Team
Short, human, straight to the point. Use these in meetings or emails:
For Leadership (20 seconds)
“We’re moving our call for papers and reviews into one portal so everything lives in one place. Setup is handled for us. We’ll have live status tracking and a proper archive we can actually use.”
For Reviewers (20 seconds)
“Log in, click on a submission, score it right there with the criteria on screen, and add comments if you want. Your dashboard shows what’s assigned and what you’ve finished. Let me know if you want a quick tour.”
For Submitters (15 seconds)
“Start from the guidelines page, create an account, and follow the prompts. The form adapts based on your answers. You can save and come back. We’ll flag anything required before you submit.”
A Rollout Plan That Respects People’s Time
- Start with two champions. Find one reviewer and one chair who’ll preview the system and give you a quote you can share with everyone else.
- Record a short demo. Ten minutes max. Show the login, how to start a review, where the criteria live, conflict disclosure, and where messages go.
- Create a one-page quick start guide. Three steps with screenshots and a support contact. That’s it.
- Send exactly two reminders. One at the midpoint, one three days before the deadline. Include a direct link and how many reviews are left.
- Close the loop. After decisions are made, ask for one improvement suggestion and share the small wins you delivered.
Show Small Wins with Simple Metrics
Once the system is live, track a few signals to prove it’s working:
- Submission Completeness Rate: A rising rate is proof that your forms and guidance are clear. If you see high incompleteness, it flags confusing instructions that need immediate attention.
- Reviewer completion rate: On-time reviews mean realistic workload
- Support questions by category: Dropping questions means better design
Share these wins with your team to reinforce that the switch was worth it.
Ready to See Abstract Management in Action?
Want to see how the PM-led setup works? Join a 15-minute walkthrough with a CATALYST Project Manager. We’ll show you the reviewer and submitter flows, handle your setup, share tips, and answer your questions live. Schedule your walkthrough?
Keep Learning
New to this whole process?
New to planning timelines and building forms? Read the Beginner’s Guide to Abstract Management.
Share The Love!